Skip to content
Bridgr
Evidence layer, not a platform

Don't replace your tracking. Add the source of truth it's missing.

Bridgr is a neutral, consent-aware attribution layer your advertisers install in minutes. It documents the customer journey and feeds the affiliate system you already run — it doesn't replace it. Here is how that compares to the alternatives.

The old way

Rip and replace

Migrate your network onto a new platform. Months of integration, setup fees, retraining, and lock-in. Your affiliates wait while you rebuild what already worked — and you still don't have a neutral record.

With Bridgr

Add the evidence layer

Drop a layer onto your advertisers' sites. No developer, no migration, live in days. You keep your stack — the signal flowing into it becomes clean, consent-aware, auditable, and independent of any single party.

Bridgr and wecantrack on opposite ends of the same pipe Advertiser site Publisher tools in out Bridgr clean data in Your network credits the sale wecantrack reads data out Same pipe, opposite ends — better data in means better data out
Bridgr (new) Your existing systems Bridgr and wecantrack on opposite ends of the same pipe
The comparison

Bridgr next to the tools you'd otherwise reach for

RedTrack is an advertiser-side aggregator. Everflow, TUNE and Affise are full platform replacements. Building in-house is your engineering time. Bridgr is the only one that adds an independent record on top of what you already run.

 
Bridgr
the evidence layer
RedTrack
advertiser aggregator
Everflow · TUNE · Affise
enterprise platforms
Build in-house
status quo
Approach
Adds an independent record
compare.table.rows.0.bridgr.note
Pulls data after the fact
compare.table.rows.0.redtrack.note
Full platform replacement
compare.table.rows.0.enterprise.note
DIY engineering
compare.table.rows.0.inhouse.note
Neutral source of truth
Yes
Independent of any single party
No
Advertiser-side view
No
The network's own platform
No
You are one of the parties
Replaces your tracking system
No
It feeds your existing one
N/A
Reads from your networks
Yes
You migrate onto it
Yes
You become the system
Developer work for advertisers
None
Snippet or plugin + a wizard
Self-serve
Advertiser sets it up
Integration
A real project
All of it
compare.table.rows.3.inhouse.note
Time to live
Days
compare.table.rows.4.bridgr.note
Hours / advertiser
compare.table.rows.4.redtrack.note
Months
compare.table.rows.4.enterprise.note
Quarters
compare.table.rows.4.inhouse.note
Setup & integration fees
None
compare.table.rows.5.bridgr.note
None
compare.table.rows.5.redtrack.note
Typically significant
compare.table.rows.5.enterprise.note
Your eng cost
compare.table.rows.5.inhouse.note
Consent-aware (reads any CMP)
Built in
TCF v2 + Consent Mode v2, recorded per touch
Limited
compare.table.rows.6.redtrack.note
Varies / add-on
compare.table.rows.6.enterprise.note
Build it
compare.table.rows.6.inhouse.note
Survives cookie loss (server-side)
Yes
First-party, beats Safari ITP
Partial
compare.table.rows.7.redtrack.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.7.enterprise.note
If you build it
compare.table.rows.7.inhouse.note
Documents full journey incl. paid
Yes
gclid, fbclid, affiliate, organic
Yes
compare.table.rows.8.redtrack.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.8.enterprise.note
If you build it
compare.table.rows.8.inhouse.note
White-label under your brand
Yes
compare.table.rows.9.bridgr.note
No
compare.table.rows.9.redtrack.note
Sometimes
compare.table.rows.9.enterprise.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.9.inhouse.note
Immutable audit trail & attribution fairness
Yes
You set the rule; Bridgr documents the journey
Reporting only
compare.table.rows.10.redtrack.note
Model baked in
Changing it is a project
Build it
compare.table.rows.10.inhouse.note
Vendor lock-in
Low
You keep your system
Low
compare.table.rows.11.redtrack.note
High
compare.table.rows.11.enterprise.note
You own upkeep
compare.table.rows.11.inhouse.note
Indicative cost
Recovery share only
No base fee — pay only on documented recovery
Per advertiser
Low, but not yours
Enterprise quote
High + fees
High eng cost
compare.table.rows.12.inhouse.note

Competitor positioning reflects publicly available material at the time of writing. Verify current pricing, features, and policies with each vendor before relying on this comparison.

The point

What you don't have to do

Every other option asks you to give something up — your platform, your developer time, your budget, or your control. Bridgr asks for none of it, and adds the one thing none of them do: an independent record.

  • No migration

    Keep the tracking backend you already run. Bridgr sits on top of it.

  • No advertiser dev time

    A snippet or plugin and a no-code wizard. Your advertisers are live in minutes.

  • No setup or per-integration fees

    You're not paying to onboard or to bolt on each network.

  • No retraining your ops team

    Your workflow stays. The data flowing into it just gets cleaner and auditable.

  • No rebuilt postbacks

    Bridgr conforms to your postback scheme and feeds your system in its own format.

  • No surrendered control

    You set the attribution rule and own the payout policy. Bridgr documents what happened — it never decides it for you.

You're already paying for tracking. Bridgr gives it a source of truth.

Recovery share only — no base fee, no per-advertiser subscription. Bridgr isn't the platform; it's the independent record that makes yours defensible. Prove it on a few of your advertisers before you pay a cent.