Skip to content
Bridgr
Attribution layer, not a platform

Don't replace your tracking. Add the layer that fixes it.

Bridgr is a consent-aware tracking layer your advertisers install in minutes. It feeds the affiliate system you already run — it doesn't replace it. Here is how that compares to the alternatives.

The old way

Rip and replace

Migrate your network onto a new platform. Months of integration, setup fees, retraining, and lock-in. Your affiliates wait while you rebuild what already worked.

With Bridgr

Add a layer

Drop a layer onto your advertisers' sites. No developer, no migration, live in days. You keep your stack — the signal flowing into it just gets clean, consent-aware, and auditable.

Bridgr and wecantrack on opposite ends of the same pipe Advertiser site Publisher tools in out Bridgr clean data in Your network credits the sale wecantrack reads data out Same pipe, opposite ends — better data in means better data out
Bridgr (new) Your existing systems Bridgr and wecantrack on opposite ends of the same pipe
The comparison

Bridgr next to the tools you'd otherwise reach for

RedTrack is an advertiser-side aggregator. Everflow, TUNE and Affise are full platform replacements. Building in-house is your engineering time. Bridgr is the only one that sits on top of what you already run.

 
Bridgr
the layer
RedTrack
advertiser aggregator
Everflow · TUNE · Affise
enterprise platforms
Build in-house
status quo
Approach
Adds a layer to your stack
compare.table.rows.0.bridgr.note
Pulls data after the fact
compare.table.rows.0.redtrack.note
Full platform replacement
compare.table.rows.0.enterprise.note
DIY engineering
compare.table.rows.0.inhouse.note
Who pays for it
The network
compare.table.rows.1.bridgr.note
The advertiser
compare.table.rows.1.redtrack.note
The network
compare.table.rows.1.enterprise.note
You
compare.table.rows.1.inhouse.note
Replaces your tracking system
No
It feeds your existing one
N/A
Reads from your networks
Yes
You migrate onto it
Yes
You become the system
Developer work for advertisers
None
Snippet or plugin + a wizard
Self-serve
Advertiser sets it up
Integration
A real project
All of it
compare.table.rows.3.inhouse.note
Time to live
Days
compare.table.rows.4.bridgr.note
Hours / advertiser
compare.table.rows.4.redtrack.note
Months
compare.table.rows.4.enterprise.note
Quarters
compare.table.rows.4.inhouse.note
Setup & integration fees
None
compare.table.rows.5.bridgr.note
None
compare.table.rows.5.redtrack.note
Typically significant
compare.table.rows.5.enterprise.note
Your eng cost
compare.table.rows.5.inhouse.note
Consent-aware (reads any CMP)
Built in
TCF v2 + Consent Mode v2
Limited
compare.table.rows.6.redtrack.note
Varies / add-on
compare.table.rows.6.enterprise.note
Build it
compare.table.rows.6.inhouse.note
Survives cookie loss (server-side)
Yes
First-party, beats Safari ITP
Partial
compare.table.rows.7.redtrack.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.7.enterprise.note
If you build it
compare.table.rows.7.inhouse.note
Captures full journey incl. paid
Yes
gclid, fbclid, affiliate, organic
Yes
compare.table.rows.8.redtrack.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.8.enterprise.note
If you build it
compare.table.rows.8.inhouse.note
White-label under your brand
Yes
compare.table.rows.9.bridgr.note
No
compare.table.rows.9.redtrack.note
Sometimes
compare.table.rows.9.enterprise.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.9.inhouse.note
Audit trail & multi-touch fairness
Yes
Roadmap v2 — your attribution rule
Reporting only
compare.table.rows.10.redtrack.note
Yes
compare.table.rows.10.enterprise.note
Build it
compare.table.rows.10.inhouse.note
Vendor lock-in
Low
You keep your system
Low
compare.table.rows.11.redtrack.note
High
compare.table.rows.11.enterprise.note
You own upkeep
compare.table.rows.11.inhouse.note
Indicative cost
Per-network
A fraction of a platform
Per advertiser
Low, but not yours
Enterprise quote
High + fees
High eng cost
compare.table.rows.12.inhouse.note

Competitor positioning reflects publicly available material at the time of writing. Verify current pricing, features, and policies with each vendor before relying on this comparison.

The point

What you don't have to do

Every other option asks you to give something up — your platform, your developer time, your budget, or your control. Bridgr asks for none of it.

  • No migration

    Keep the tracking backend you already run. Bridgr sits on top of it.

  • No advertiser dev time

    A snippet or plugin and a no-code wizard. Your advertisers are live in minutes.

  • No setup or per-integration fees

    You're not paying to onboard or to bolt on each network.

  • No retraining your ops team

    Your workflow stays. The data flowing into it just gets cleaner.

  • No rebuilt postbacks

    Bridgr conforms to your postback scheme and feeds your system in its own format.

  • No surrendered control

    You set the attribution rule and own the payout policy. Bridgr documents what happened.

You're already paying for tracking. Bridgr makes it worth paying for.

A fraction of an enterprise platform, because Bridgr isn't the platform — it's the layer that makes yours work. Prove it on a few of your advertisers before you pay a cent.